Okay, You Found Us...

expletive deleted... so while you're here, check out our rants, ravings, snipes and gripes - and let us know what's on your mind.

Translator

Shop ScreenGuardz.com Today!

Blog Schedule

Mondays - Jim Lawter - Webmaster and Editor in Chief
Tuesdays - Six-Eye Jackson - Media Critic
Wednesdays - Scrud Kelley - Scam Editor
Thursdays - O. C. DeeDee - List Editor
Fridays - Broadus - Sponsored Reviews
Saturdays - Hodgepodge Grumblebeak - Graphics Editor
Sundays - T-Shirt and Razoo Kelley or OmegaSquad – Commentary
Random Days - Guest Contributors

Recent Comments

Donna: thanks for the info - poor chiropractor is falling...
samuel: m2Puqu http://www.spam.com...
kxhlpqcjx: L1P4qf spam, [url=http://spam.com/]spam[/url], [l...
Arnel Estanislao: I have worked with Alex Meshkin and Bopaboo from J...
Andrew Pelt: Hi. Very interesting Post. Not really what i have ...
Xenia Reichart: I have to agree and found this very interesting :-...
Eileen: Sheba van Clowder does not look amused!...
Nick: The Best quality! http://www.spam.com.page buy zol...
primerica scam: Great post. I've covered some aspects you didn't c...
Angeles Dosreis: google...
Shop SpiritHalloween.com Today!

“Star Trek” Spoilers - Great Word of Mouth?

The more I go to these big-budget movies surrounded by “controversy” - the supposedly leaked “Wolverine” print, the Christian Bale “Terminator” tirade, the upstart re-casting of “Star Trek” - the more I realize that we’re just being played.

Wolverine was fine, and the leaked print was a good full-length trailer. Terminator looks fine, too, as Bale appropriately tirades through the entire movie. And Star Trek is better than fine, as it proves to be exceptionally faithful to Gene Roddenberry’s original creation.

The only criticism I’d have for this eleventh “Star Trek” movie - and yes, it truly earns its place in the “Star Trek” movie canon - is that it’s sometimes too visual. While it’s nice to see space shots where concepts like “up” and “down” are appropriately dismissed, sometimes there are too many things cluttering up the screen. Ships, debris, bodies, planets, torpedos, phaser streams, sparks and smoke - just calm down!

Otherwise, what a story! Producer/Director J.J. Abrams has done his homework, and has very cleverly rebooted the franchise.

First, the homework. The portrayals of the major characters from TOS (”The Original Series” - which was actually a major re-working of an earlier unsold version) are marvelously entertaining, and many references are made to the TOS bible. At first glance (I’ll watch it a few more times, I promise), I noted specific nods to the Jeffrey Hunter/Christopher Pike TV pilot, the prequel TV series “Enterprise,” the TV series “The Next Generation,” and the films “The Wrath of Khan,” “The Search for Spock,” “The Voyage Home,” and even “Nemesis” (II, III, IV, and X).

And here comes the “spoiler” …

As for re-booting the series, Bravo! 78-year-old Leonard Nimoy’s time-traveling Ambassador Spock from the original time line manages to kick off an entirely new time line with our favorite characters intact. This Enterprise crew can now have entirely new story lines and even revisit old story lines with new outcomes. This is a wonderful development!

The look is updated, but not in any offensive manner. Higher tech sights and sounds fit the budget while paying homage to the original low-budget presentation. Of all the new touches, my favorite is the Starfleet uniform. I always hated the original pants which flared out well above the ankles, and the gut-hugging velour shirts. Now the male crew members wear comfy jeans that gather nicely above the shoes, and cozy black undershirts. Much more practical. Uhura’s miniskirt and boots still wow. Sex sells.

Of course there’s the typical over-noisy fringe Trekkies/Trekkers who still want to see a plywood Enterprise bridge captained by a 79-year-old William Shatner. Get therapy! This is just a fictional series, albeit a long-lived and prosperous one.

(These are the same lunatics who frantically lobbied NASA to name the first non-space-bound shuttle “Enterprise,” while NASA had wanted to name a later, fully space-worthy ship after the “Star Trek” starship. These morons robbed history of its first actual spaceship named “Enterprise.”)

By the way, you nay saying nimrods, this franchise re-boot means that Kirk will NOT necessarily die to thwart the El-Aurian Soran, which opens up a logical story line for an octogenarian Shatner in “Star Trek XII,” due out in 2011. I can’t wait!

Six-Eye Jackson

Related Posts
  • Binge Reading I'm a binge reader. Not that I read every minute of the day or that I'd read any indiscriminate thing. No, I find an author I like and then read...
  • Night of the Scare-Your-Kids-to-Death Masterpiece "There's too many of them. I can't kill the world." Robert Mitchum as Reverend Harry Powell. Would you like me to tell you the little story of right-hand/left-hand? The story...
  • Going Out to the Picture Show - 30,000 Years Ago We were taught in school that those ancient cave paintings of hunters and animals were created by prehistoric priests, supposedly to conjure good luck for an upcoming hunt, or chronicle...
Related Websites

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WebRing.

If you like this post, please consider subscribing to my full feed RSS.